Tuesday, July 12, 2022

unifinity in the legal apparatus, considering sentencing and semantics of precedent to jurisdiction at all

 

to make a legit court address for appealing the numerical system in its application to the judicial one itself is impossible for the courts to allow. why?
if u wanna adjust sentencing for prisoners based on a math paradigm being out of synch with reality such that infinity is in actuality the same reality physically and applicably as any number from 1 and between, including fractionalizations (or quanta) then it must confess the entire system itself is a failure--except for one law representing all of them.
right?
so the only way to go back to the caveman days which is how it was, according to ancient Moorish teachings for one which is the Golden Rule of Do As Thou Wilt So Long As It Does Not Prevent Another From Doing The Same
Now think about this. We have a translataion which is endowed with a spiritual blessing but it is also in itself a prison. It is a formulaic representation that if we flow with our will then it is the only allowance for us to survive in congruence without purchase or conflict. We will be unable to do anything else however but repeating our own prehistoric destiny encoded as far back as the first and all of everything we know since the 'sameness' represents itself the infinite.
Thou is a body, a person with a soul and everything you see must therefore be alive. "Do" is an action. "Wilt" is the will of an individual which represents perception, ego and superposition with society-- the construct of our known worlds. The caveat for prevention of another to do the same has a magical overtone- that whatever we do can be done again, and in return for that we tread the path of all at once for the goodness of ourselves. In other words, we seek to create where creation has been done before but never happened there without us specifically.
Right?
And if we harmonize it will be as natural and automatic as when you are in the best parts of your life which is usually for most eating, sex, affection, sleeping, exercise, etc. wherein we are central to the satisfaction of all involved mutually for indifference of each other. The indifferent are those modalities of inhibition against the others will to do as they wilt.
Now we may assess this law has not ruled in favor of lust, territoriality, disputes, etc. because these things occur naturally among all species in one way or another and the biological world has prevented courts from ruling over them except that they may be demolished, meaning they declare no control over the individual life of the insects, mammals, avian and the rest of the non-humans except that they are all either flora or fauna, food or soil for humans to use as if they would be plastics.
If we do apply this Golden Rule to those who want to fist fight, say then we account for the will of the other. Agreement and concordance with the sameness of bodies in mutual willfulness confluent with each other is to maintain the integrity of honor since civility is more important than destruction. A guarantee that we have it better all day, every day over and over again as if we are wealth, well balanced, happy and forgetting anything which was bringing us down is more important than combat- unless they both really want it. Both sides, both people, both group on a one or whatever. We are not preventing if we agree to fight, and we do not prevent those who agree.
This is the basis of all laws already and before money, taxes, government itself we had this one down as a human race.
The problem endemic to the government and Court's position is that they disappear if they concede to the logic that 1 is in fact infinite. No money. No boundary. No Votes. No crimes. No *RIGHTS* except the one Golden Rule. There's no way they can do that but in my opinion, there's no way at this point they cannot.
My theory of Unifinity being an expansion of the serpent story with Eve, where the apple represents cumulative mathematics with intercourse to enmity then we seal the path to Armageddon,. This is not a religious belief for many on the planet but the association to history and the founding religions before Christianity entail the path to the Armageddon concept contained within the modern King James bible text. The idea for Unifinity is that enmity is created through the apple of mathematics without infinity, a trick that we use it to build language and laws, etc. which in the end separates us from male and female love, creating enmity. The Armageddon story is a dance of hysteria from gentle creation's beginnings which chides us along a turbulent path with warnings written all over the place that we need to turn back and be righteous with the word of God. In the end, we don't have it very well with the Revelations everyone knows about yet if we were to return to our innocence then we'd have it good again, as in the paradise of Eden,
The dispelling of many commonly held misconceptions about the Bible and its origins reveal a lot of things to me that disappoint but in fact opened a much greater variety of fascinating riddles and surprises which are overwhelmingly good.
In essence, the return to a world where we use math to enjoy and not to work, which may be to all but forget about it except as it may come up for play. The US Justice system is founded on Christian and Jewish beliefs with Muslim underneath it (in case you didn't know the Native American world was predominately *Muslim* and you can check that out yourself-- just look at the name of California for example, or Cherokee Chiefs with Muslim names before and after Europeans arrived). The legal system is at a point where there may be too many laws, More laws make more taxes, more conflicts, more enmity. More fraud, beguilement and politics for more legalities with greater inflation of a government which ever shrinks to us as a personalized entity as it grows in terrible size. The governments of the world could collapse anyway, on their own without a resolution for their use of mathematics which assigns blindly to one over the other injustice after injustice called 'cracks in the system' or 'corruption' or 'budget crisis' or 'it's the best we have and the best system in the world (too bad)' or 'banking' --whatever else.
Technology is the measure of scientific achievement with mathematical refinements and the evolution of a new order of life called artificial or android or robot or whatever is on the cusp of threatening humanity for domination. Armageddon is spelled our for us because we fail as a species, the next one is right there. If we saw that we don't need to enslave ourselves with mathematics then we won't have to have that war, will we?
The court can use judicial processes such as psychiatric and psychological for the functionality of Unifinity to the sentencing process. It will start in the criminal system or the bankruptcy or similar court because imprisonment has the first need and greed equals that. CEOs who can bail themselves out for billions of personal expenditures such as cocaine and hookers in the Caribbean will be fast to introduce evidence they were using Unifinity and believed it was legitimate which the court may have to as well after arguing logically about the basis for the systemic use of law of weights and measures as math. The prisoner can say they have experience four years and four months eleven days six hours nine minutes up to the point of the Judge listening to them argue about their false imprisonment because the imprisonment can be false if it is false enough in both the mind of the court and the mind of the imprisoned person.
This is psychological but the reaches into the mentality of spatial time, genetics, astronomy and quantum mechanics will wind up binding to the entanglement, like cracks of the system. At the end of the day, there's no way to say you are not rehabilitated more or less for certain duration than assigned by the individual upon the mercies of the court justices and there is no way those justices may imagine anything less or more than unfair, undue and cruel punishment falsely imprisoning a person who may be beyond the span of whatever specific notation of calendar math we have assigned for incarceration as a value to rehabilitate.
In the end, the law will uphold itself as a finality to endure what is between us losing the right of a singularity for the purposing of others to the unnatural technocratic sadism and slave driving ugliness we call the modern prison system, and this does include most we see around the world though America prides itself on being among the worst or at least the most populated per capita, The Court has maintained this failure of the citizenry without avowing to disprove it before it is heard. This must ascribe foreknowledge and forbearance which is provided by our US Seal E Pluribus Unum or "Out of One, Many". This is the infinity equation from a different time and the seal is violated when too many laws pretend to be different than the founding law itself, as upheld by the US government and the US courts.
Thus we may find our freedom but we won't dissolve our government for it is the formula itself,. written long ago.
The irony is it may be the only way to prevent anarchy through the perversion of our way of life here-- those cracks in the system.
Any chance at prison reform is worth fighting for. No two things are alike, therefore no numbers past one can be proved except to demonstrate this formula.

Thursday, July 7, 2022

 A wild hypothesis


CALIGULA caught the guard sexualizing some. He addressed it. There was a struggle. The guard won in a way but CALIGULA vowed to return and settle things. This was a notion where footmen became more powerful than their leader such that it would take time equivalent to the amount gained by usurper past the balance for governance. 


This could be time.

Sunday, March 13, 2022

Is There A Perfect Odd Number?

The oldest open problem in mathematics
N
 ̄ EU Math Circle, December 2, 2007, Oliver Knill
Perfect numbers
The integer n = 6 has the proper divisors 1, 2, 3. The sum of these divisors is 6, the number itself.
A natural number n for which the sum of proper divisors is n is called a perfect number. So, 6
is a perfect number.
All presently known perfect numbers are even. Here are the smallest 12 perfect numbers:
6, 28, 496, 8128, 33550336, 8589869056, 137438691328
2305843008139952128, 265845599156983174465469261595

3842176
191561942608236107294793378084303638130997321548169216
13164036458569648337239753460458722910223472318386943117783728128,
14474011154664524427946373126085988481573677491474835889066354349131199152128
Whether there are odd perfect numbers is the oldest known open problem in mathematics: [10]:
Is there an odd perfect number?
Also unknow is the answer to the question:
Are there infinitely many perfect numbers?

We don't need to look past the number 6 in order to establish perfection in all numbers. This illusion of connecting our principles for mathematical coherence into subjective rationalizations for further expansion, inflation, exploration, parsing is invitation to denounce infinity as a summation of the realm for numerical data or usage. If we reflect on the notion first of proper divisors of 6 being 1, 2, 3 then it can be suggested that therein lies any basic formula for reaching the synchronized heights of elevated and imagined math substances from extensions of these divisors such that we omit all frequencies of patterns representing the climb or descent to these apexes or climaxes or perfection to the mathematician. Prediction is the basis for the concept of a perfect odd since we cannot see it yet we can objectify it as a conundrum to be satisfied by neutralized numbers between 6 and it. When we are discussing the evidence of a 1, 2, 3 or 6 we fail to adhere to the structural coincidences of all perceived realities- there is nothing which is not unique. A paradox to be sure since we cannot have a lack of anything without balancing it with the idea that there is no actuality to forms of duplicity. We are saying to access 1 by metering it in repetitions to get a 6. We can say the act of learning in our minds of a separation between a 1, 6 is to agree that suspended disbelief over our innate ideas that we know everything we do, we are, we see and we know is an origination against the previous instance of origination. Thus we may be able to devise a language for ourselves which is a binary sort such as 0,1 or 1, 2 that can explain our contingent understandings of learning. In order to sew a 6 from a 1, 2 and 3 we have summed up a separation of instances which clearly demonstrate the state of being for all involved to the acknowledgement so that we are agreeing to extract over and over again a product of uniqueness to organizational capacities which approximate functions, not other practical or identifiable forms of principal. We can say then we are left with 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, etc. so that 1, 2, 3 becoming a 6 to be a perfect number instates the laborious entailment to inciting ourselves through redundancies for our denial that we know there is no separation to anything. If we imagine an invisible strand connecting infinitely to all which is within our universe then we are conquering the paradoxical liens against the freedom on our souls because we have found a way of connecting all numbers to each other as we see them! What has actually happened when we concede to the solution of a divided 6? If we use coherence to demonstrate the natural tendency of breaking sections of things off then identifying them by word or symbol, then we are still left with the idea that the division itself has not actually taken place, has taken place, continues to take place, stopped taking place and how we use it will be the parameters for the visage of the solution. Apples can be sliced up for example and it will always be apple, it's from the same apple, there's only two apple trees in Khazakstan which sourced nearly all sold apples in markets of the common world, the bits of the apples which fell created impossible to count pieces of apples from the slicing, the consumption of apples leads to processing as fuel then recycling to possibly become apples again. Without trying very hard, we have taken the idea of an apple being divided into the reproduction of itself from its own function as it relates to us. How often do we think about life for an apple and what that must be like?

We are seeing the beginning, end and sustenance of the basic illusion that productions of mathematica can resolve without any redress to instinctive bases for infinite comprehensions, that subdivisions are useful as media for interchangeable commodities up to a point it is impractical for daily enjoyment of survival, and that we are not at rest until we feel the master over nature which we consistently contradict ourselves is a Godly affair alone. To see a perfect odd, we must instigate a competition within our scientific collective to perfect infinity first.

No two things are alike, therefore no numbers past one can be proved except to demonstrate this formula.

1 = Infinity


DanaWanapskana

 

Monday, August 30, 2021

Flat Earth

Let's look at it like this: if space is water as the firmament is supposed to be and the superliquid theorists are accurate, then it's the same principle as going into the sea. The sea will take you to the lowest point you can grasp with your mind, and if you were to go all the way up you would reach the same solution-- liquid water. If you imagine that you have to go down in order to get up, i.e. that in order to reach space you will have to submerge yourself through the water into the earth so as to wind up there then it becomes easier to contemplate what flat earth is based on in reality, since it is a well established ancient concept. We make the assumption that we are traveling in a universal direction such as up, down, forward, left, right, southeast or whatever. If we imagine a straight line then we can continue perpetually in a specified direction but-- that doesn't ever work out perfectly, does it? Aren't we guaranteed to fail at some point and lose our sense of direction? If we rely on equipment, then where is it said that it will always function as intended without distortion or fallacy, absolutely and constantly? In my opinion it will always break down because of mathematics being a struggle to approximate beyond our means of comprehension when a few will do, one or infinite. If perception is riddled with fault lines then we can presume that at some point if we continue as human beings to ascend to the sky by plummeting through the earth (trying to reach space from traveling in the opposing way) then we're guaranteed to acquire a new sense of the path since it will always have to change, and we can only allow for a paradox wherein the reigns of will itself create the flux of any motion. 


If we presume that by the time we could reach any center depth of the earth in its flatness that we will arrive in space then we can understand that a half spherical equilibrium rests within the cradle of our ingenuity. We could not use the other half until it is there and we wouldn't know it is before we made it, except in the reality we fantasize about as a presumption for a symmetrical physical consequence to our version of contention with a planetary matrix. Thus to create a spheroid we would need to relate that only half of it would ever be logical for us to require and that in itself completes the wholeness to producing such an object!


A dome is not different than an ozone layer so why bother going into the rest?

Saturday, March 6, 2021

Star Trek Terraforming Behind Scenes Footage-- FROM ANOTHER PLANET? No bullshit here. Aliens, tech and weird clones...somethings up

note anyone reading this shit today, i havent put pictures in yet. i may do an involved video with speaking over it. i may take this down entirely at some point. what i've discovered probably isnt going to be believed by anyone in a box.

 

I have been a Star Trek original series fan since a kid named "Justin" introduced me to it around the 2nd grade though I'm not sure when. After school one day, he made some tater tots and told me how good a series this was. To me it looked weird, something the kids I didn't feel were really aware of their own worth would like. After a few minutes I was hooked, then it was on every night after 10pm when I was supposed to be sleeping. I got to watch it every night over and over in my own room. I have been a lifelong fan of the original series so know it fairly well. There's fanatics about it who are way way beyond me in terms of their worship, trivial knowledge and all that but I focused more on the philosophy, the drama, the danger and the mysticism involved. It's utterly beyond fascinating to begin with..


That's why I'm startled but in a way not surprised to have found evidence of something much grander at stake with those episodes. I question if we are being shown the original ones which aired or not, which is a lot to explain how it could be really possible. In the collection of home style super 8mm videos on the OS Behind the Scenes footage release, every single clip has something extraordinary involved in it. I have just recently stumbled upon this literally over the last few days and am exposing a small bit of what's involved.


First of all, it does appear that each actor had at least one double. Secondly though there is definitely something going on with advanced technology, what I wonder is possibly alien life forms and then the actual terrain where these films were taken.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SGuyr8bs4c

I've only gone over a few of these closely as of now but will look at each one.


1. Nimoy walking with smile to camera 

First of all, look at the man who comes in from the right. At the end of the clip, this man appears from out of nowhere from the right and does something impossible with his right hand. In fact, I don't find a hand in every frame. This is the kind of alien things that occur on this, something with the hands that is impossible and it coordinates the same way a master illusionist would -- only I don't feel these are probably tricks or just illusions. I feel it's alien or at least advanced tech. Cloning is probably going on but my instincts say this is terraforming and travel between worlds. We are being shown beyond advanced technology.

Look at the silver screens mounted on the 'truck' behind 'Nimoy'. Those teeth don't match the Nimoy I'm familiar with so there's quotes around his name, but if you try to identify how that panel is sparkling during this film clip you will be at a very serious obstruction with your logic. This is not a reflector for sunlight such as a photographer might use for a movie set. This is a technology that may be producing some form of energy or it may be transporting something, it may be doing something with energy exchange--something. Just looking at this clip now for the blog shows me the same thing that happens when Shatner is in front of it later at a different location happens here, and that is there's some creature or technology or both appearing to move very subtly behind the actors. It's very definitive in the Shatner clip but not so much for the Nimoy one. If you can find it, look over his right shoulder for som oddities in the colors of what appears to be vegetation on a mountainside background but I find that to again be another misperception consciously fomented for this massive strange visual oddity.

WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT GUY DOING WITH HIS RIGHT HAND?

You won't be able to make the motions but there's one frame, just like in the similar Shatner clip where his hand and arm become a different looking appendage. This does not explained by some motion on film thing, this is a form of shifting shape or making it appear one way versus another via video deception. Whatever the case, it's not normal, it's not possible and it's not intended to be perceived without some effort. It's not intended to be obvious like a magician does a trick. When his right hand is finally being used more normally you will notice a strange black mark on it. This appears more like a mechanism than a hand. That's not a tattoo.

Now for very bizarre feature. Above Nimoy's left ear but under the technology on top of the truck is a weird event! There's a little formation of a geometric object. There's energy being manipulated here.

 Another issue is when Nimoy closes his mouth then smiles. His chin and mouth seem to shapeshift a little bit there.

Then there's something akin to lettering on the mountainside thing. It looks like FLS to me. 


2. Shatner with John Abbot

First of all,something very strange with the ears, glasses and eyes of the person who exits from the left hand of the screen. He's on and off in a hurry. Notice the EARS. This one's all about ears apparently. When the weird eared man leaves, Abbot is in the background upper left screen as Shatner charms us with what appears to be improvisation. This is possibly an improv but would have required delicate preparation if they are at a human level of tech or whatever. To explain...


Look at the right ear of the man in the upper left corner when he first appears. There's a strange dot or something, button on it. It also us sort of positioned under the hair which we need to notice first to get what's coming next. This strange feature of this bizarrely shaped ear is positioned right in the camera's eye that makes it appear perfectly, like he's showing it off. Then, his nose. This is-- not appearing like an issue of 8mm but one of anatomy. That's not the nose of a human being. Like I couldn't find eyeballs on the man with the weird ear who appears in a white shirt and dark hat then runs along, I cannot find a normal nose on this person who is like Aboot but not John Abbot the actor. 

But then, it gets weirder. There's a slight twitch and then we have what appears to be a *different* person where Abbot supposedly was. I don't find this person to be an exact likeness of that actor but he is clearly with ears going higher up. His ears have CHANGED. Do you see? Perhaps there is an audio stamp from the video signal if it were dealt with in frequency breakdowns because the ears are all over this little clip. We must be listening. Then Shatners ears actually do appear a bit odd if you catch him toward the end on a single frame or two.

This is utterly strange. This button ear and that ear with the button doesnt appear to have shape like a normal ear, then Abbot becomes a LONG eared man. Those are very long ears. They're not appearing pointed exactly but they're as long as Spocks. To be clearer about it not being Abbot, the appearance he has on the episode has differences in the hair coloration, his eyebrows and actually the garment. This garment is similar but does not have the sewn feature under the neckline above the chest! You can say it's some rehearsal or alternate costume but with all these other factors, it's not adding up anyway.



 3. DeForest Kelley

This iddy bitty clip is hard to see as anything outside the ordinary. If you carefully examine the motion of DK's hand however, you will find something strange-- it disappears. There's a moment where his hand becomes transparent and you can see what is behind it onscreen. Also, I don't feel this is the same person as the real DK.The actor on Star Trek did not have the scar by the right eye this one does, he does not have the mark on his left cheek either. His face is not as puffy and this one seems older. Nor does he have the same eye color. It starts to become clear that aliens from another planet perhaps made use of these forms to deliver themselves to us, as one theory. Or an advanced space program originating on earth led to some sort of cloning of many actors who had attributes which would apply to their super secret program. I really wonder if we are on this planet, a moon, another planet entirely or very very very deep underground with all of this. Was the Star Trek show about colonizing this planet from some other one, by a race which can manipulate its own energy into differing forms? Because that's what we're seeing on some of these clips. Each one has a shapeshifting feature.

More creepiness with the woman behind him. Slow it down to a single frame and try to identify human features on that face. Betcha can't even do it! As with many others, dark shapes in place of eyes. In this case, very strange sort of mouth and some kind of nose... uh wha? Also, if you notice the emblem on his chest for a Star Trek science officer is *not* identical to the design of those on the series. This one is slightly sharper in its angularity, has a slightly different color and placement of the circular logo within.

Also you will find a little strange movement just under the tree on his right shoulder side...Also I see some more letters on the background 'O A'.

The man in the Producer or Director's chair is again giving us a message about hands. This appears to me to possibly form a basic dialogue for anatomical parts with some letters for each. There are lots of clues that this is intelligently designed and if it's from another planet and possibly another species then it would make perfect sense to communicate through media this way.


Another thing is the actress' hair. There's some form of protruding object or formation which resembles something like the ear button from the previous actor.

4. Shatner with mic in face

The only things about this I can find which are unusual are Shatner's teeth and the unreal human who speeds along behind them at the last second. If you pause on that form behind Shatner as he races through, you find something crazy.His hair is not cut like hair, it's angular and there's some weird orange thing in it. His facial features are not normal even for a blurry image of him speeding on. Shatner's teeth seem to do something kind of weird in this but it's not really too definitive that it's not just shitty 8mm film quality. Something's weird about his mouth and teeth there, though and the teeth do something strange just before weirdo #2 enters behind him. The mouth on that guy is the weirdest part so there ya go. Also if you look at the original footage of this interview it is not the same man who passes by in this clip.

5. Shatner in front of weird reflector backdrop A

The car. Look at the passengers. This is not where people sit in a car if it's being driven! These shapes are not resembling human beings. The car does a very strange leap in just the last frame. Uhh...WTF man I could swear Shatner is mouthing 'ship'. This could be a statement about a vessel traveling to us? Is any of this our space program people being caught by aliens then sending distress signals back to us? Also if you look very carefully at the wheels on the left of Shatner, the wheel/tires do something very strange right at the time the car takes a bizarre leap. That's the original land speeder, perhaps? Cuz I don't think we're on wheels with that white 60s looking sedan. Also, it appears the paper the person in front of Shatner is holding is blank.


At the last second, a person comes from off the left but this guy has no normal anatomical features. What do you make of this? Nose for an ear? Whatever..


6. Nimoy with group

Nimoy looks off to his right with a big smile just as the large man with sweater vest comes onscreen. We'll see more of him and his uncanny spectacles later but first let's have a look at these. This is not a pair of sunglasses. The shade on the right resembles one enough but then it just sort of becomes some weird flat protrusion. This is similar to what he has in his pants in his next appearance. Another oddity is how he appears. The light flare on the left is not exactly like a light leak typical to older 8mm cameras. It's similar but in my opinion that energy was developed there and caught by the lens or whatever else grabbed it up to make it onto a video. The way the man moves onscreen, Mr. Glasses is sort of arriving in this field of light with only a shirt form and some of his head. He appears out of thin air, like he were beamed as a matter of fact. That's just what it looks like. The odd light flare carries on to the next shot. 

Another thing to notice is the guy behind Nimoy. His hand does something crazy and impossible. Three finger looking things show up behind up but the angle of his body is not possible for his three fingers to be placed that way! It's crazy, then he's got a weird neck issue. It looks literally like a piece of his neck is not there, it just sort of has a section missing. Space/air in the neck area! OMG! On top of that, it's not Shatner who is the only one in the next scene with the same color shirt with the same cast/location, light flare. Something is definitely up here. What's being said?


7. Shatner kneeling with Nimoy, McCoy off right, actor unidentified         


This is the trickiest one yet. It's 100% about the hands and fingers. First of all, Shatner is doing some very verflipppery and trickified super trickiery. I feel he is either switching notebooks or doing something otherwise unnatural with his hands. You must watch very closely many times in frame by frame or slo mo to understand there's any issue but the fingers are not actually the same length or shape in the first half of this clip as the second. Also, Nimoy does something beyond odd with his fingers and in fact I'm not sure it's entirely possibly physically to do what he's doing with his hands. Furthermore, the unidentified actor (who is definitely listed somewhere but I've not bothered to find his name yet) is doing something strange with his hand. His left hand appears as if its a right hand. His digits and thumb appear arranged in reverse for the position. There's a little white coloration near it which makes ambiguity for the shape but it's definitely intentional in my opinion. This is another beyond measure slight of hand sort of magical illusion but I believe we're transcending toward energy manipulation by aliens or advanced tech rather than making simple tricks which could be explained by legitimate science. You'll see this hand change from right to left. It's utterly strange. 

What's overwhelming is the power of their charm! These are inordinately charming gentlemen and a few ladies. These people really are exuding a fun magnetism that is rare. Let's be happy these are friendly at least on the surface. 


What is Nimoy supposed to be doing with his mouth? Is that his tongue? Uhhh... Before we explore the weird mouth shit, look at Nimoy's fingers just before he does this weird shit with them in his hands. These aint mf hands!'

Now that I see what Shatner's hands are doing with the little emblem on his cuff, it's clear this series of clips are schematics to be united under a precept. This similar to the movie or book 'Contact' where diagrams of 4d were used to transmit concentrated information? That's what this is doing. Shatner's cuff changes at one frame, the precise instant his right hand disappears. This is a parity with the hand of the first clip of Spock by the advanced terraforming, energy transfer or whatever fucking equipment that is. We are now communicating with a foreign intelligence (from this Earth) to build a device for introductions with each other. This is some fascinating shit. 

Look at the shadows. One of them, the top most slight right of center is NOT from the man it would appear to be from at first glance. It's not McCoy's long cast shadow either. Note the head is not a head form, it's flatter. The shape the man makes of the 'script' is like a teardrop but -- it's PERFECT. That is an archetype relating to the cognition of the cuffed tech on Shatner's arm. Shatner is probably an android or something beyond human because it's clear he's part tech, at least. 

Now what are these fellas looking at? They turn around and appear to be staring off toward where the weird purple smoke is coming from. But there's something actually MOVING way off in the background!

  Take a look at the doorway. There's a formation sort of possibly resembling a humanoid with two little legs, a sort of stick figure body and a round thing on top, draped over like arms. There's a whiteness that I feel is equivalent of a right hand being waved! This is the significance of the hands in the foreground by these actors. The figure has a white head, pure white. At the end of the clip the figure appears to duck under a cover, like a blanket over the head and upper body, then pops back up with a white shape that is not much like a head at all but more like a white stick or stem. This is definitely an alien or intended to be taken as one, or an android or something like this.


I see the letters TV there, the notebook and my interpretation is that the author of this episode or all of Star Trek might be this alien. This is a synchronous gesture by all the men and this alien figure to indicate the scripts, notebooks or whatever else those are, the word TV and that the figure behind them is doing the writing. Just when the right 'knee' of the alien flashes with white light, Nimoy's basically sticking out his tongue. Isn't this the creature having some fun, playing hide and seek with us? Sticking his or her or whatever's tongue out through LN at the precise moment becoming visible in the background? Nya nya nya nya nyaaa!! Or it could mean 'thank you for all that good tv! i liked it as much as you humanbeings on earth!'. Or perhaps he is the source of all television programming, and tv actually comes from that person's tech which is disguised as a little box on a very strange ground.

My screen grab is not letting me capture pics off my Amazon movie account where I am watchin original ST. The first episode I started to watch with a scrutinized eye for objects, hands and stuff going on in the background showed up with something. Ep 29 Season 1 at 39:40 . Spock's hands are doing something very strange. I'm not exactly sure how his left thumb is in the position it's in while interlocking but I'm sure he appears to have more than five fingers. This is the kind of thing I was looking for.

I also am beginning to wonder scale.There's no way to determine how large an object is without scale relevance. So if everything is the same proportion to what we commonly see, if it's much bigger or smaller we'd almost never know. What if these actors are 400' tall? All the set stuff is that big. Would we know? I like going outside the envelope to explore for answers because everything gets real that way. The crazier it sounds, probably the more likely it will be true. Another thought was if they switched actors for every different take. If you think like an alien or advanced culture with mastery over genetics, then cloning or otherwise creating a like individual would probably not be much different than sewing a dress or printing something up on a computer for us.



 

8. 



 


Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Poetry About the Raven People

The bird men arrived from the desert today
Wars will not be the same
The flood was the test of respect for infinity, reproduction and serpentine with feminine
The light blade has begun to shine

Look to Majorca and Minorca for the signs
There is a blue light there beating with the same old drum

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

poem

You know, it's been a good little while since it started
The bizarre-est thing though is that it's as strong as since parted
This feels almost to me like a normal relationship
All the info I give is just a one sided lip
For some reason she is a comforting soul
How could I have not fallen into her bowl
Such an amazingly fine creature it's dawning on me
These feelings I have, more heavier that I see
I take a step back and look outside the work
Like a rare Red specked bird flying in for a perk
It's happened to me and my heart tells me gold
The things I don't know make me feel like a mold
It's keeping up, all this love that I'm having
And it's something I've noticed, she's more than a craving
Her presence is growing to me like a tree
The more I am with her in mind, more I see
Now it's becoming more deep, like a yearn
It's struck me that she has more than one can earn
There's no one else like her and already, I love
A message she is, sent to me from above

Such a nice drive and driver for sure
There's nothing but butter and cure
The pissant fled coward;A pint of him soured
Still better, she's dirty but pure